Passport Path
MarriageRO-MAR-01

Marriage-based naturalisation - spouse of RO citizen (Art 8(1)(a), 5y)

Citizenship in Romania

Eligibility
The spouse of a Romanian citizen may naturalise on a reduced 5-year residence term, counted from the date of the marriage, provided the applicant is married to and cohabiting with the Romanian-citizen spouse (Legea 21/1991 (R) Art 8(1)(a); RO-EVID-027, RO-EVID-004). This is not a separate "marriage article" and confers no automatic acquisition of citizenship by virtue of marriage: it is the ordinary naturalisation route (Art 8) with one of its two residence floors lowered fro
Timeline
varies by case complexity
Renunciation
Not required

Timeline

There is no fixed statutory grant period; the controlling administrative figures are a moving ANC snapshot, not a statutory term (VC-RO-F-43). The dated ANC Informare gives an average processing time for the Art 8 track of approximately 2.09 years (RO-EVID-046); a later ANC Stadiu-dosar snapshot and a 03-Feb-2026 parliamentary question report a higher current Art 8 average of around 2 years 6 months (RO-EVID-047). These figures are snapshots that drift upward and should be re-pulled at finalization; they are not entitlements. Structurally, the Commission's report term was reset by L14/2025 to up to 2 years, extendable by up to 6 months (Art 15(10)–(11)), applied also to pending files per the transitional Art XIV(2) (RO-EVID-048). After a favourable ANC President order, the applicant must take the oath of allegiance within ONE YEAR of communication of the order (Art 20(2); RO-EVID-084, VC-RO-F-07) — this is a one-year window, not six months. Citizenship is acquired on the oath date (Art 20(1); RO-EVID-084), and failure to take the oath within the one-year term causes the order's effects to cease (Art 21(1)). The 5-year residence clock itself runs from the marriage date, and any year with more than 6 months spent abroad is excluded (Art 8(4); RO-EVID-033), which can lengthen the qualifying period in practice.

Fees & cost

The statute does not fix a single application fee in its body; the principal pinned cost is the card de cetatenie romana — the chip-bearing citizenship card that replaces the paper certificate — set at 91.50 lei (VAT included), effective 01.08.2025 (RO-EVID-038; pinned to the ANC announcement RO-SRC-007, not to the statute, because Art 22^1(13) delegates the figure to Imprimeria Nationala; VC-RO-F-32). Some legacy ANC pages still display the prior 90.00 lei figure — the current amount is 91.50 lei. The card cost is borne by the holder and paid in advance with the application, with proof attached, and is refundable on rejection within one year (Art 22^1; RO-EVID-018, RO-EVID-038). Ancillary costs that fall outside the citizenship statute and are not pinned here include: apostille/super-legalisation of foreign documents, certified Romanian translations, criminal-record certificate fees, and the costs of assembling residence and means evidence — these vary by jurisdiction and document volume and should be checked against the live consular/registry fee schedules. There is no investment threshold or payment-for-citizenship element in this route: Romania operates no citizenship-by-investment scheme (VC-RO-F-15), and the marriage route is a residence-and-conditions naturalisation, not a transactional one.

Appeals & review

An order rejecting an Art 8 marriage-naturalisation application is challengeable within 15 days of communication at the Sectia de contencios administrativ si fiscal a Tribunalului Bucuresti, with recurs to the Curtea de Apel Bucuresti (Art 19(4), as set by Legea 2/2013; RO-EVID-090, VC-RO-F-24). This is the grant/reacquisition-rejection venue and it governs RO-MAR-01. It is not a generic "competent Curte de Apel with recurs to the ICCJ": the appeal architecture is jurisdictionally fixed on the Bucharest courts, and there is NO ICCJ recurs layer in any citizenship-order appeal (VC-RO-F-24). For completeness, the parallel venues for other order types are: a renunciation-rejection order follows the same Tribunalul Bucuresti → Curtea de Apel Bucuresti route (Art 31(6)), and a withdrawal order goes directly to the Curtea de Apel Bucuresti and is FINAL with no recurs (Art 32(7), as amended L14/2025 pct 34). For the marriage applicant, the operative point is that an adverse ANC order on the naturalisation application is reviewable first at the Tribunalul Bucuresti and, on recurs, at the Curtea de Apel Bucuresti — and no further. Because the substantive grant decision is heavily discretionary (Art 12(3)), judicial review focuses on legality and procedure rather than substituting the court's own assessment of the conditions.

Example scenarios

  • ELIGIBLE to apply under Art 8(1)(a) (marriage 5-year track); likely grant if the Citizenship Commission interview is passed and Art 12(3) certainty is met

    All Art 8(1) conditions are satisfiable: 5-year-from-marriage-date residence with subsisting marriage and cohabitation (Art 8(1)(a); RO-EVID-004/-027), age 18+, lawful means (d), good conduct (e), and the NEW knowledge tests (f)/(g) verified by interview (RO-EVID-028/-029). Files in person at ANC HQ (Art 13(1); RO-EVID-083). Grant remains discretionary under the Art 12(3) any-doubt standard (RO-EVID-082), and citizenship vests only on the oath taken within one year (Art 20; RO-EVID-084, VC-RO-F-07). Not automatic by marriage (Art 3; VC-RO-F-42).

  • NOT eligible for the 5-year marriage reduction; falls back analytically to the ordinary 8-year track (Art 8(1)(a) first limb)

    Art 8(1)(a)'s reduced 5-year-from-marriage-date term requires that the applicant 'convietuieste cu acesta' (cohabits with the Romanian spouse). De facto separation defeats the cohabitation condition, so the marriage-reduction limb is unavailable even though the marriage subsists (Art 3: marriage alone does not confer citizenship; VC-RO-F-42). The applicant may still naturalise on the ordinary 8-year residence basis if the full residence and all Art 8(1)(b)-(g) conditions are met. The any-doubt-to-rejection rule (Art 12(3); RO-EVID-082) means the cohabitation gap would, if doubted, defeat the reduced-term application.

  • Application REJECTED for failure of the NEW Art 8(1)(f)/(g) knowledge conditions, despite meeting the marriage/residence limb

    Because RO-MAR-01 runs through Art 8, the NEW Art 8(1)(f) (language + culture/civilisation) and (g) (Constitution + anthem) conditions apply in full and are verified by interview before the Commission (RO-EVID-028/-029; VC-RO-F-11). Per Ordin ANC 84/2025 the applicant must score an average of at least 5; failing the interview means an Art 8(1) condition is unmet, and Art 12(3) requires certainty all conditions are satisfied (RO-EVID-082). The marriage reduction shortens the clock but does not waive (f)/(g). The applicant may re-apply after preparing for the interview. The Art 10/11 B1 certificate and OUG 16/2026 deadline are irrelevant here (VC-RO-F-14).

  • Reduced-term clock NOT yet satisfied: the 2 years with >6 months abroad are excluded, so the applicant has not accrued 5 qualifying years and must wait

    Art 8(4) provides that any calendar year in which the applicant spends more than 6 months outside Romania does not count toward the Art 8(1)(a) residence period (RO-EVID-033). Two excluded years leave the applicant short of the 5-year qualifying residence measured from the marriage date, even though the marriage and cohabitation are genuine. The application is premature for the reduced term until enough qualifying years accrue. Income/means and a passed interview do not cure the residence-continuity gap; Art 12(3) certainty would not be met (RO-EVID-082).

  • Citizenship NOT acquired: the effects of the favourable order cease because the oath was not taken within the one-year window

    Under Art 20(1) citizenship is acquired on the date of the oath; under Art 20(2) the oath must be taken within ONE YEAR of communication of the ANC President's order (RO-EVID-084; VC-RO-F-07 — one year, not six months). Failure to take the oath within the legal term causes the cessation of the order's effects (Art 21(1)). The applicant, though substantively qualified and approved, did not become Romanian and would need to re-engage the process. This illustrates that a favourable grant order is not itself acquisition — the oath is the vesting act.

Informational summary compiled from primary legal sources — not legal advice. Citizenship law changes; verify with the competent authority before acting. Last verified 2026-05-30.

Track changes to this route

Descent and naturalization rules change. We'll email you in plain English when anything affecting Romania updates — no spam.