Aquisição por tratado internacional/dupla cidadania bilateral
Cidadania em Montenegro
- Elegibilidade
- A cidadania pode ser adquirida ao abrigo de um tratado internacional ratificado (Art. 18); O artigo 18.º, n.º 2, permite a dupla cidadania ao abrigo de um tratado bilateral recíproco. O acordo de cidadania bilateral ONLY ME (ME-Macedónia do Norte, assinado em 6 de março de 2009) NÃO regula a aquisição/perda de nacionalidade, pelo que não operacionaliza uma via de dupla cidadania.
- Renúncia
- Não exigida
Visão geral
ME-BIL-01 is Montenegro's acquisition-by-international-treaty route under Article 18 of the Law on Montenegrin Citizenship, together with the Article 18(2) gateway to lawful dual citizenship under a reciprocal bilateral agreement. Article 18(1) is one of the four enumerated modes of acquiring Montenegrin citizenship (Art 4(4): 'po međunarodnim ugovorima i sporazumima' — by international treaties and agreements), alongside origin, birth on territory, and admission. Article 18(2) adds that such a treaty MAY establish dual citizenship, but only on a condition of reciprocity. This matters enormously in the Montenegrin system because the default rule is strict single allegiance: under Art 24(1)(1) an adult Montenegrin who voluntarily acquires a foreign citizenship loses Montenegrin citizenship ex lege — EXCEPT in the case provided by Art 18(2). The Art 18(2) reciprocal-treaty mechanism is therefore the SOLE statutory gateway through which a post-independence acquirer could lawfully hold both Montenegrin and a foreign citizenship. The critical operative finding, however, is that this gateway is statutory-but-HOLLOW: as of 2026 the only bilateral citizenship agreement Montenegro has concluded is with North Macedonia (signed 6 March 2009), and that agreement does NOT regulate the acquisition or loss of nationality — so it does not operationalize any dual-citizenship pathway. No nationality-regulating bilateral treaty is in force, no Montenegro-Serbia agreement exists despite intermittent negotiations since ~2008, and Montenegro's reservation to Article 16 of the European Convention on Nationality preserves its renunciation requirement. The route is thus documented as a real statutory mode whose dual-citizenship limb is currently dormant/inoperative; the only persons lawfully holding dual citizenship by right are pre-independence transitional holders under the Constitutional Implementation Act, not Art 18(2) beneficiaries.
Base jurídica
The governing article is Article 18, in the acquisition chapter, section 4 ('Sticanje crnogorskog državljanstva po međunarodnim ugovorima i sporazumima'). Native operative text, Article 18(1): 'Crnogorsko državljanstvo može se steći na osnovu ratifikovanih međunarodnih ugovora ili sporazuma koje je zaključila Crna Gora' — Montenegrin citizenship may be acquired on the basis of ratified international treaties or agreements concluded by Montenegro. Article 18(2): 'Međunarodnim ugovorima i sporazumima iz stava 1 ovog člana može se ustanoviti dvojno državljanstvo, pod uslovom uzajamnosti' — by such treaties/agreements dual citizenship MAY be established, on condition of reciprocity. Three further provisions complete the legal basis. (a) Article 2 (domestic-primacy hinge): 'A Montenegrin citizen who also has the citizenship of another country is considered a Montenegrin citizen in proceedings before the Montenegrin authorities, unless otherwise determined by ratified international treaties' — treaties can displace the default single-allegiance treatment, which is precisely what an Art 18(2) treaty would do. (b) Article 24(1)(1) (the loss-side carve-out): native 'je dobrovoljno stekao državljanstvo druge države, osim u slučaju predviđenom članom 18 stav 2 ovog zakona' — voluntary acquisition of a foreign citizenship triggers ex-lege loss EXCEPT in the Art 18(2) case. (c) Article 25 (loss-by-treaty mirror): 'Crnogorsko državljanstvo može se izgubiti po međunarodnim ugovorima ili sporazumima koje je zaključila Crna Gora' — the loss-side counterpart, currently dormant absent a nationality-regulating treaty. Transitional anchor: the Constitutional Implementation Act (2007) Art 12 governs the pre/post-independence dual-citizenship cohorts (see era_context) and is the conceptual reference point for the unresolved Serbia negotiations. Amendment lineage: Art 18 has stood unchanged across /2008 · 40/2010 · 28/2011 · 46/2011 · 20/2014 · 54/2016 · 73/2019 · 77/2024 (77/2024 touched only Art 37).
Cenários de exemplo
Os cenários de exemplo são exibidos em inglês.
not eligible — there is no ratified Montenegro–Serbia nationality treaty, so the Art 18(2) gateway is hollow
Art 18(2) permits dual citizenship only under a ratified reciprocal bilateral treaty regulating nationality (ME-ASSERT-077). As of 2026 there is NO concluded or ratified Montenegro–Serbia dual-citizenship agreement (positive disconfirmation, ME-ASSERT-080); negotiations since ~2008 remain unresolved over a conceptual impasse. With no operative treaty, the Art 24(1)(1) carve-out is empty — acquiring Montenegrin citizenship while keeping Serbian would trigger ex-lege loss of one of them, not lawful dual status.
not eligible — the ME–North Macedonia 2009 agreement does not regulate acquisition or loss of nationality, so it confers no dual-citizenship right
The only concluded ME bilateral citizenship agreement is with North Macedonia (signed 6 March 2009), but per GLOBALCIT it does NOT regulate the acquisition or loss of nationality (ME-ASSERT-078). It therefore does not operationalise an Art 18(2) dual-citizenship pathway and creates no eligibility. The agreement must not be over-read: it is not a nationality-regulating reciprocity treaty within Art 18(2), so it cannot disapply the Art 24(1)(1) ex-lege loss rule.
conditional (route mischaracterisation) — her dual status is lawful, but the basis is Const Impl Act Art 12(1), NOT Art 18(2)
Her lawful dual citizenship does not derive from Art 18(2) (whose gateway is hollow — no nationality-regulating treaty in force; ME-ASSERT-078) but from the succession grandfathering: Const Impl Act Art 12(1) vests a continuing right to retain Montenegrin citizenship in everyone who also held another nationality ON 3 June 2006 (ME-ASSERT-096; cross-ref ME-SUC-01). The correct pin is the constitutional-transition right, not the BIL treaty route — Art 12(1) is the principal lawful exception to the Art 24 single-nationality bar.
not eligible — Montenegro's reservation to ECN Art 16 preserves the renunciation requirement; the ECN creates no dual-citizenship right
Montenegro ratified the ECN (ETS No. 166) on 22 June 2010 (EIF 1 Oct 2010) WITH a reservation to Article 16 (ME-ASSERT-079). ECN Art 16 would normally bar requiring renunciation of another nationality, but the reservation preserves Montenegro's renunciation rule (Law Arts 8(1)(2), 24(1)(1)), making the strict bar ECN-CONSISTENT, not ECN-violating. The ECN therefore confers no dual-citizenship eligibility; it confirms, rather than relaxes, the single-allegiance default.
conditional (prospective) — yes in principle, but only once such a treaty is ratified and in force; no operative effect today
Art 18(2) is permissive and predicate-dependent: dual citizenship MAY be established BY a treaty, on reciprocity (ME-ASSERT-077). Art 2 confirms a ratified treaty can displace Montenegro's single-allegiance default treatment of dual nationals (ME-ASSERT-105), and Art 24(1)(1)'s carve-out would then protect the treaty's beneficiaries without fresh legislation. But the gating event is political-diplomatic — conclusion and ratification of a reciprocal nationality treaty — which has not occurred (ME-ASSERT-080). Until then, no individual right crystallises.
conditional — the acquisition-by-treaty mode is statutorily live but currently instance-less; no in-force treaty provides for acquisition
Art 18(1) makes acquisition on the basis of a ratified international treaty/agreement a genuine, standing statutory mode — one of the four Art 4(4) acquisition modes (ME-ASSERT-076). But it is dormant, not dead: it can only be invoked where an in-force ratified treaty actually provides for acquisition of Montenegrin citizenship and the applicant falls within its personal scope. No such current treaty instance exists, so there is presently nothing to apply for; were one ratified, the general Arts 27-31 procedure (one-year decision, reasons, upravni spor) would apply.
Resumo informativo compilado a partir de fontes legais primárias — não é aconselhamento jurídico. A lei de cidadania muda; verifique com a autoridade competente antes de agir. Verificado pela última vez em 2026-06-27.
Acompanhe as mudanças desta rota
As regras de descendência e naturalização mudam. Enviaremos um email em linguagem clara quando algo que afeta Montenegro for atualizado — sem spam.