Who is eligible for Foundling abode (abandoned newborn presumption) (Hong Kong SAR)?

FOUNDLING: An abandoned new born infant found within Hong Kong who appears to the Director to be of Chinese descent is taken, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be the legitimate child of a Chinese citizen who was a permanent resident of the HKSAR at the time of the child's birth (Cap.115 Sch.1 para 1(3)(a)). This deems the parentage that then supports permanent-resident (abode) status; it is a residence-layer safeguard against abandonment leaving a child without abode. FOUNDLING (non-Chinese branch): An abandoned new born infant found within Hong Kong who appears to the Director to be NOT of Chinese descent is taken, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be the legitimate child of a parent not of Chinese nationality who had the right of abode in Hong Kong under paragraph 2(d) at the time of the child's birth (Cap.115 Sch.1 para 1(3)(b)).

Do you have to renounce your current citizenship for Foundling abode (abandoned newborn presumption)?

No — this Hong Kong SAR route does not require renouncing your current citizenship.

Foundling abode (abandoned newborn presumption)

Citizenship in Hong Kong SAR

Not citizenship — not a passport. This route documents an overseas/residency status, not citizenship acquisition. It does not make you a citizen and does not grant a passport.

Eligibility: FOUNDLING: An abandoned new born infant found within Hong Kong who appears to the Director to be of Chinese descent is taken, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be the legitimate child of a Chinese citizen who was a permanent resident of the HKSAR at the time of the child's birth (Cap.115 Sch.1 para 1(3)(a)). This deems the parentage that then supports permanent-resident (abode) status; it is a residence-layer safeguard against abandonment leaving a child without abode. FOUNDLING (non-Chinese branch): An abandoned new born infant found within Hong Kong who appears to the Director to be NOT of Chinese descent is taken, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be the legitimate child of a parent not of Chinese nationality who had the right of abode in Hong Kong under paragraph 2(d) at the time of the child's birth (Cap.115 Sch.1 para 1(3)(b)).
Renunciation: Not required

Legal basis

Cap.115 Sch.1 para 1(3)

Example scenarios

The child benefits from a statutory foundling presumption under Cap.115 Sch.1 para 1(3), being presumed to be the child of a Chinese-citizen PR (or, alternatively, a non-Chinese para-2(d) PR) unless shown otherwise, and thereby acquires a right of abode presumption.
This is a rebuttable evidentiary presumption, not an unconditional guarantee — social welfare/child-protection authorities and Immigration Department jointly handle these cases; confirm current procedural specifics if advising directly.

Informational summary compiled from primary legal sources — not legal advice. Citizenship law changes; verify with the competent authority before acting. Last verified 2026-07-05.

Check your eligibility Ask the AI

Track changes to this route

Descent and naturalization rules change. We'll email you in plain English when anything affecting Hong Kong SAR updates — no spam.