רכישה מחדש (ponovno sticanje)
אזרחות במונטנגרו
- זכאות
- אזרח לשעבר שאיבד אזרחות ורכש אזרחות זרה רשאי לרכוש מחדש לאחר >=שנה מגורים, תוך מילוי סעיף 8(1) סעיפים 1,2,7 (סעיף 26).
- ויתור על אזרחות
- נדרש
סקירה כללית
ME-RST-01 is Montenegro's re-acquisition route (ponovno sticanje crnogorskog državljanstva) under Article 26 of the Law on Montenegrin Citizenship. It is a live route (operative_today: true) addressed to a specific population: a person who PREVIOUSLY HELD Montenegrin citizenship, then LOST it, and in the meantime ACQUIRED the citizenship of another state. For that person Article 26 opens a restoration pathway on markedly easier terms than ordinary naturalization — a residence threshold of at least one year, against the ten years demanded by Article 8 for first-time admission. Typical beneficiaries are former Montenegrin nationals who were released from (otpust) or lost citizenship by operation of law (Art 24, e.g. on voluntarily acquiring a foreign citizenship) and who now wish to recover their Montenegrin status, including returning emigrants and persons whose life circumstances brought them back to Montenegro. The route is statutorily a sub-mode of acquisition by admission (prijem): re-acquisition is still an admission decision by the competent authority (the Ministry of the Interior, MUP), but on a tailored Article 26 condition-set rather than the full Article 8 set. Its place in the framework is as the mirror-image of the loss chapter (Arts 19-25): where Arts 20-23 govern voluntary release and Art 24 governs ex-lege loss, Art 26 is the dedicated 're-entry' provision that lets a former citizen who has since naturalized elsewhere come back into the citizenry, subject to a reduced residence requirement and a trimmed subset of the Article 8 integrity conditions. Because Montenegro maintains a strict single-allegiance default (Arts 8(1)(2), 24(1)(1)), the route's central tension is whether the re-acquirer must release the foreign citizenship he acquired.
מי זכאי
Article 26 imposes a closed, trimmed condition-set, which must be read against Article 8(1). (1) ENTRY GATE: the applicant must be a person who LOST Montenegrin citizenship and ACQUIRED another state's citizenship — both limbs are necessary; the provision does not reach a former citizen who is currently stateless (that case falls under Arts 14/40 logic, not Art 26). (2) RESIDENCE: at least one year of legal and continuous residence in Montenegro before/at application, measured by the Article 17 bylaw criteria (the Odluka o kriterijumima defines what counts as zakoniti i neprekidni boravak — lawful status plus unbroken physical presence, with permitted short absences per the bylaw). This is the route's signature concession: one year, versus Article 8(1)(3)'s ten. (3) AGE: Article 8(1)(1) — the applicant must have reached 18. (4) RELEASE FROM FOREIGN CITIZENSHIP: Article 8(1)(2) via Art 26(2) — the application is rejected unless the applicant has been released from the citizenship of the other country. This is decisive: re-acquisition is NOT, on its face, a dual-citizenship route; the re-acquirer must in principle renounce the foreign citizenship he holds. The Article 8(2) carve-outs to item 2 remain available by their own terms (statelessness; a country that will not release; or a country that conditions release on military service, on signing a renunciation statement) — but Article 26(2) does NOT incorporate the broader Art 8 set, only items 1, 2 and 7. (5) SECURITY/DEFENCE: Article 8(1)(7) — there must be no obstacle on grounds of the security and defence of Montenegro, assessed under the Art 17 bylaw / Art 6 security-obstacle grounds. Conditions Article 8(1) items 3 (10-year residence), 4 (accommodation/income), 5 (criminal-sentence bar), 6 (language) and 8 (settled taxes) are NOT imported by Art 26 — a deliberately lighter integrity screen than first-time naturalization. Cross-reference: the Art 18(2) bilateral-treaty dual-citizenship exception (route ME-BIL-01) is the only statutory way to escape the item-2 release requirement, and it is currently hollow (no nationality-regulating treaty in force).
בסיס משפטי
The governing provision is Article 26, set in Chapter IV (PONOVNO STICANjE CRNOGORSKOG DRŽAVLjANSTVA). Article 26(1), native operative text: 'Lice koje je izgubilo crnogorsko državljanstvo i steklo državljanstvo druge države može ponovo steći crnogorsko državljanstvo ako podnese zahtjev za ponovno sticanje crnogorskog državljanstva i najmanje godinu dana zakonito i neprekidno boravi u Crnoj Gori' — a person who lost Montenegrin citizenship and acquired another state's citizenship may RE-ACQUIRE Montenegrin citizenship if he files a re-acquisition application and resides legally and continuously in Montenegro for at least one year. Article 26(2): 'Zahtjev iz stava 1 ovog člana odbiće se ako nijesu ispunjeni uslovi iz člana 8 stav 1 tač. 1, 2 i 7 ovog zakona' — the application is REJECTED if the Article 8(1) conditions items 1 (age 18), 2 (release from the foreign citizenship) and 7 (no security/defence obstacle) are not met. Article 26(3): 'Zakoniti i neprekidni boravak.. utvrđuje se prema kriterijumima propisanim aktom iz člana 17 ovog zakona' — legal continuous residence is determined per the criteria of the Article 17 bylaw. Article 17 delegates to the Government the criteria for Art 8(1) items 3, 4 and 7, for Art 12, and for Art 24(1) items 5-8; that delegation is operationalized by the Government 'Odluka o kriterijumima za utvrđivanje uslova za sticanje crnogorskog državljanstva prijemom' (Sl. list CG 47/08, 80/08, 30/10, 56/12, 15/22), which defines 'legal residence' and the Art 6 security-obstacle grounds. Amendment lineage: the Law's cascade is 13/2008 · 40/2010 · 28/2011 · 46/2011 · 20/2014 (Constitutional Court annulment) · 54/2016 · 73/2019 · 77/2024; the one-year re-acquisition residence in Art 26 is unchanged across this cascade (77/2024 amended only Art 37 register-data use). Re-acquisition is thus a stable, primary-pinned provision.
תרחישים לדוגמה
התרחישים לדוגמה מוצגים באנגלית.
Marko Đurišić · age 38 · nationality: German (formerly Montenegrin)
not eligible (yet) — he has not completed the one-year legal continuous residence
Art 26(1) conditions re-acquisition on at least ONE YEAR of legal and continuous residence in Montenegro, measured under the Art 17 bylaw criteria. Six months is short of that minimum, so the application would be premature. He must complete a full unbroken year of lawful residence (ordinary short absences tolerated per the Odluka o kriterijumima / Constitutional Court gloss) before filing, and will still need to satisfy the item-2 release and item-7 security conditions.
Petar Roganović · age 57 · nationality: American (formerly Montenegrin)
eligible — he qualifies for re-acquisition on the reduced Art 26 condition-set
Art 26(1): a person who lost Montenegrin citizenship and acquired another State's citizenship may re-acquire it on at least ONE YEAR of legal continuous residence (vs Art 8's ten) — he has 14 months. Art 26(2) requires only Art 8(1) items 1 (18), 2 (release from the foreign citizenship) and 7 (no security obstacle); items 3,4,5,6,8 are NOT re-tested. His willingness to release US citizenship satisfies item 2; subject to the security screen, he qualifies.
Branka Vujošević · age 45 · nationality: Australian (formerly Montenegrin)
not eligible (as a dual national) — Art 26(2) requires release from the foreign citizenship; she must renounce Australian to re-acquire
Art 26(2) imports Art 8(1) item 2: the re-acquisition application is REJECTED unless the applicant is released from the foreign citizenship. Re-acquisition is NOT a dual-citizenship device. The only statutory escape from the release requirement is an Art 18(2) reciprocal bilateral treaty, which is currently hollow (no nationality-regulating treaty in force). Australia is not a non-releasing State, so no Art 8(2) carve-out applies — she must surrender Australian citizenship for a positive decision.
Hajrudin Ljaljević · age 50 · nationality: Iranian (formerly Montenegrin)
conditional — he may proceed via the Art 8(2) carve-out on a renunciation statement where formal release is legally unavailable
Art 26(2) tests whether Art 8(1) item 2 is met, and item 2 is defined inclusive of its Art 8(2) carve-outs (moderate/liberal reading): release 'does not apply' where the applicant is stateless, where his country will not release him, or where release is conditioned on impossible terms — on signing a renunciation statement. So a re-acquirer from a non-releasing State may proceed on a renunciation declaration rather than an impossible formal release, plus the one-year residence (satisfied) and item 7 security screen. Outcome conditional on the authority accepting the carve-out.
Veljko Tomić · age 41 · nationality: Serbian (formerly Montenegrin)
not eligible — the application is rejected on the Art 8(1) item 7 security/defence obstacle, but the refusal is reviewable
Art 26(2) expressly imports Art 8(1) item 7: the re-acquisition application is REJECTED if there is an obstacle on grounds of the security and defence of Montenegro, assessed under the Art 17 bylaw / Art 6 security grounds (/044). On the balanced reading the screen is a reasoned, reviewable assessment, not an unfettered veto: the MUP must give reasons (Art 29(3)) and an upravni spor lies before the Administrative Court (Art 29(4)); by the U-III 687/21 principle the court can scrutinise the security assessment itself.
סיכום אינפורמטיבי שנערך ממקורות משפטיים ראשוניים — אינו ייעוץ משפטי. חוקי אזרחות משתנים; אמתו מול הרשות המוסמכת לפני שתפעלו. אומת לאחרונה ב-2026-06-27.
עקבו אחר שינויים במסלול זה
כללי מוצא והתאזרחות משתנים. נשלח לכם אימייל בשפה פשוטה כשמשהו שמשפיע על Montenegro מתעדכן — ללא ספאם.