Исторический режим натурализации 1790->1952 (свободно-белый -> 1870 -> 1906 -> 1940 -> INA)

Historically, federal naturalization eligibility turned on four shifting variables: a RACIAL qualification (1790-1952), a RESIDENCE-duration requirement (oscillating 2/5/14/5 years across 1790-1802), procedural steps (declaration of intention, then court admission, then post-1906 federal standardization), and a sex/marital overlay (marital expatriation of women, 1907-1922/1931). Under the founding-era statutes only a 'free white person' could naturalize; the 1870 Act added 'aliens of African nativity and persons of African descent'; persons of Asian descent remained barred until the racial bars were comprehensively removed by INA 1952 section 311. Because this is a closed regime, no living applicant naturalizes 'under' these statutes today - but they remain load-bearing for adjudicating derivative claims, retention/restoration questions, and the historical-cohort status of persons naturalized (or barred) before 24 Dec 1952. Modern naturalization runs under INA 316 = 8 USC 1427, whose 5-year residence baseline traces directly to the Naturalization Law of 1802 (2 Stat. 153, 14 Apr 1802).

The residence requirement is the regime's most-amended variable. The 1790 Act required 2 years' residence; the 1795 Act raised it to 5 years and added a 3-year prior declaration of intention; the 1798 Act spiked it to 14 years; the Naturalization Law of 1802 restored 5 years (with the 3-year prior declaration), and that baseline has persisted to the present (now INA 316(a) = 8 USC 1427(a)'s 5-year continuous-residence requirement). Pre-1906, residence was proven by witness testimony before the admitting court; the 1906 Act standardized documentation (certificate of arrival). The modern continuous-residence and physical-presence refinements (e.g., the >=30-month physical-presence floor and the absence-based break presumptions of INA 316(b) = 8 USC 1427(b), plus the 6-to-3-month state-residence reduction by the Immigration Act of 1990) are INA-era elaborations, not features of the founding statutes. The historical statutes spoke of 'residence' generically without the modern continuous-residence/physical-presence bifurcation.

Documenting a historical naturalization (or a historical bar) relies on Statutes-at-Large for the governing rule and NARA/court records for the individual act. The load-bearing statutory pins are: 1 Stat. 103 (1790), 1 Stat. 414 (1795), 1 Stat. 566 (1798), 2 Stat. 153 (1802), 16 Stat. 254 (1870), 22 Stat. 58 (1882 Chinese Exclusion), 34 Stat. 596 (1906), 42 Stat. 1021 (Cable 1922), 46 Stat. 1511 (Act of 3 Mar 1931, racial-vestige removal), 54 Stat. 1137 (NA-1940), and 66 Stat. 163 (INA 1952 section 311 racial-bar removal). For an individual claim, the documentary set is the court naturalization record (declaration of intention, petition for naturalization, certificate of naturalization) held by NARA and the issuing court, plus arrival/residence proof (certificate of arrival post-1906). Pre-1906 records are decentralized and may exist only in county/state court archives. Marital-expatriation and resumption claims additionally require marriage records and proof of the spouse's nationality/eligibility status in the relevant era.

Procedurally, naturalization was a JUDICIAL act for most of the regime. From 1790, an alien petitioned a court of record; the 1795 Act formalized the two-step process - a declaration of intention ('first papers') filed at least 3 years before, then a petition for admission after the residence period. The process was decentralized and court-by-court (with widely varying rigor and recordkeeping) until the Naturalization Act of 1906 created the federal Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization, prescribed standard forms, required certificates of arrival, instituted the English-language examination, and centralized recordkeeping. NA-1940 and then INA 1952 carried forward the declaration/petition/oath structure while progressively shifting administration toward the federal executive (ultimately USCIS under DHS; the residual judicial role is now the oath, and de novo review of denials under INA 310(c) = 8 USC 1421(c)). For historical-cohort verification, NARA holds the court naturalization records (declarations, petitions, certificates) that prove a pre-1952 naturalization.

The historical 1790-1952 regime is CLOSED, so no living person 'processes' a naturalization under it and there is no current processing-time figure for the historical statutes themselves. Where the historical regime matters today is in adjudicating a PRESENT vehicle whose facts reach back to it: (a) a USCIS Form N-600 Certificate of Citizenship confirming a derivative claim through a historically naturalized ancestor, (b) an INA 324 = 8 USC 1435 resumption for a marital-loss cohort, or (c) ordinary N-400 naturalization where no historical claim survives. For those present vehicles, the LIVE authority on timeframes is the USCIS processing-times tool at egov.uscis.gov/processing-times (check the specific form + field office), interpreted against the statutory decision framework (e.g., INA 335-336 examination/hearing for N-400). As of 2026-06-01 (verify current), published USCIS ranges for N-600 and N-400 commonly run several months to over a year depending on field-office workload; do not rely on any fixed field-office number. Historical-cohort record retrieval from NARA (court naturalization files) runs on NARA's own request timelines, separate from USCIS adjudication.

Арка сроков проживания в эпоху основания: Закон о натурализации 1790 г. (1 Закон 103, 26 марта 1790 г.) - «свободный белый человек» с хорошим характером, срок проживания в течение 2 лет - отменен Законом о натурализации 1795 г. (гл. 20, раздел 1, 1 Закон 414, 29 января 1795 г.), который установил 5 лет проживания плюс 3-летнее предварительное заявление о намерение. Закон о натурализации 1798 года (глава 54, раздел 1, 1 Закон 566, 18 июня 1798 года), мера времен иностранцев и подстрекательства, увеличил срок проживания до 14 лет; он был отменен Законом о натурализации 1802 года (глава 28, 2 Закона 153, 14 апреля 1802 года, подписан президентом Джефферсоном), который восстановил 5-летний базовый уровень (и 3-летнее предварительное заявление), дословно подтвержденный в govinfo STATUTE-2-Pg153 («он прожил в Соединенных Штатах не менее пяти лет, а в пределах штата или территории.. один год»). Этот пятилетний показатель в измененной форме сохранился до настоящего времени в INA 316 = 8 USC 1427. Каждый закон также содержал расовое ограничение «свободного белого человека», которое сохранялось (с расширением африканского происхождения в 1870 году) до INA 1952 года.

Historically, naturalization was granted (or denied) by the admitting court, so 'review' was a judicial matter from the outset; the 1906 Act gave the federal government a role in opposing petitions and instituting denaturalization (Naturalization Act 1906 section 15), the antecedent of modern INA 340 = 8 USC 1451. Apex review of the regime's constitutionality came through the expatriation cases (Mackenzie 1915; Perez 1958, overruled; Trop 1958; Schneider 1964; Afroyim 1967; Vance 1980) and the race-bar 'prerequisite cases' of the 1920s (Ozawa 1922; Thind 1923, which construed 'free white person'). Today, a person asserting a claim that turns on the historical regime (e.g., a derivative claim through a historically naturalized ancestor, or resumption from a marital-loss cohort) litigates it through USCIS adjudication with administrative appeal and, ultimately, a declaratory-judgment action under INA 360 = 8 USC 1503. The historical statutes themselves are not subject to reopening; only their application to a specific lineage/claim is contested.

The historical regime's exceptions ran in the direction of EXCLUSION rather than relief: the 'free white person' limitation (1790-1952) was the master exclusion, partially lifted by the 1870 African-descent extension and the 1943 Magnuson repeal of Chinese exclusion, and fully lifted only by INA 1952 section 311. The Naturalization Act of 1906's English-language requirement was a new condition (not an exemption). The Cable Act 1922's racial coverture proviso (section 3) was an internal carve-out that withheld the Act's marital-nationality relief from women who married men ineligible to citizenship - that vestige was removed by the Act of 3 Mar 1931 (ch. 442, section 4(a), 46 Stat. 1511), which amended Cable Act section 3 to provide that 'A woman citizen of the United States shall not cease to be a citizen.. by reason of her marriage' and that 'Any woman who was a citizen of the United States at birth shall not be denied naturalization.. on account of her race.' There were narrow procedural accommodations (e.g., military and special-class naturalizations in 1894/1918 statutes), but the core eligibility conditions (race, residence, character, then English) admitted few exemptions until the modern INA framework introduced age/residence-based English exemptions (later, section 312(b)).